Sobu Capital exists for a particular kind of investor in a particular kind of market. Australian private markets have expanded rapidly over the last decade, and most of the industry competes on volume: platforms on breadth, funds on capital raised, distributors on placement.
Sobu doesn't. We are investor-first. What we compete on, quietly and with a small group, is selection: which opportunities are worth a like-minded network seeing. What reaches that network is what the founder has personally backed with the family's own capital.
The value isn't the flow; it's the filter.

Only what we've backed ourselves reaches you.
Every fee arrangement, in writing, up front.
You subscribe and hold in your own name.
Every call stays with you.
A limited network, kept close.
That stance shapes everything that follows.
Investor first, in practice
"We invest our own capital alongside" can sound like a slogan. It isn't.
Sobu is run by a former multi-asset portfolio manager whose broader-family capital is already deployed across Australian private markets: roughly twenty-two positions with nineteen managers, generating a blended projected yield of around 11% per annum. The portfolio is predominantly private credit (the income engine), with a meaningful private equity sleeve and a selective venture allocation. The income orientation is real; most positions distribute monthly in cash.
Several manager relationships are multi-position, backed two or three times across different funds and entities. That repeat-conviction pattern is what distinguishes a selector's portfolio from a platform user's: conviction sized up over time.
Opportunities shared with our network are ones Sobu has assessed for the family's own capital first. If a manager or a deal doesn't clear that bar, it doesn't reach the network. The opportunities an investor is invited to commit to are, in most cases, ones we have already invested in ourselves.
Alignment matters because it imposes a real cost on misjudgment. We pay for our own mistakes alongside our network. There is no version of the model where we win on flow while our network loses on selection.
What gets shared, and what doesn't
Most things get a no. That's the design.
The path is consistent. A manager, warm-introduced or inbound, opens a conversation. We engage as an investor: ask substantive questions, request the materials we would want for our own capital, and run the diligence we would run for ourselves. If the opportunity is one we would commit family capital to, on terms that hold up for the end investor, we proceed. If not, we decline: no entanglement, no obligation, no pressure to pursue a referral we don't believe in.
When something does proceed, sizing reflects conviction. Family positions span a wide range, from exploratory tickets well under one percent of the portfolio to materially larger commitments when the analytical basis warrants it. Our network sees the same signal, how Sobu sizes into an opportunity reflects the strength of the call.
We are also honest about realised mistakes. One early family position, pre-Sobu, was taken on the strength of a "double-digit income" promise via proximity, with no diligence
and no governance access, and it ended up close to zero. It is the exact failure pattern Sobu's process exists to prevent. (The full case is in our onboarding materials.)

Managers reach us, as an investor first.
Our own diligence. Most get a no.
We commit our own capital first.
Only then does the network see it.
Independence and how we handle conflicts
Independence is built into the structure. Sobu manufactures nothing. We don't operate a
fund, structure a product, or hold inventory. The only honest question on every opportunity is whether it is good for the investor; there is no parallel question of whether we need to clear our own shelf.
Where economics flow, they flow from the manager to Sobu on disclosed terms: referral or rail arrangements, documented in writing and disclosed to every wholesale client, every time. Full disclosure is the floor, not the ceiling.
Where a potential conflict exists, we name it, work through it cooperatively, and let the structure resolve it. Current arrangements, including any manager relationship where the founder has held a governance role, are set out in full for qualified investors.
Two hats, separated by structure
Sobu Capital holds AFSL 559424 and works with wholesale clients only. We advise and arrange; we do not issue products, operate a scheme, or run a discretionary or managed-account service. Each investor subscribes directly with the underlying manager and holds the position in their own name.
Under that licence Sobu is the selector, and the introducer under any referral agreement with a manager. Those roles are kept apart by structure and disclosed by default. (Full licence authorisations are on our Disclosures page.)
Who Sobu is for
Sobu works for wholesale-qualified investors, high-net-worth individuals and family offices who want a selector they can call rather than a marketplace to browse, and who
value depth over breadth.
The network is small, and stays small. Capacity is deliberate. A small network keeps incentives aligned, keeps conversations substantive rather than transactional, and means
one weak referral would damage the whole relationship. Growth will be slow, by referral and trust, and will stop where more members would dilute the relationship density or the discipline.
If you want breadth, scale, daily marks or a one-stop shelf, Sobu isn't it. If you want one trusted selector, a small group of like-minded investors, and a discipline you can interrogate, that's what we built.
The sequence is simple. We confirm wholesale qualification under the Corporations Act before sharing any opportunity. Once qualified, network members see what we see, a written opportunity memo, the manager's materials, our assessment of the structure, the economics including any referral arrangement, and how the founder's own capital is participating.
Each investor makes their own decision, subscribes directly with the manager, and holds the position in their own name.
We say no to opportunities we don't believe in. We say "this isn't right for you" when something doesn't suit an investor's circumstances, even when it suits ours. Both are forms of credibility we believe in.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.